Current:Home > StocksWhat was the average 401(k) match in 2023? -GlobalInvest
What was the average 401(k) match in 2023?
View
Date:2025-04-18 23:26:46
If you work for a larger company, there's a pretty good chance that one of your workplace benefits will include access to a 401(k) plan. And if you're lucky, that plan will include some type of employer match.
Now 401(k) matches can work in different ways. In some cases, you'll be offered a dollar-for-dollar match of up to a certain amount. So your employer, for example, might say that it'll put up to $3,000 into your 401(k) plan, matching each dollar you contribute yourself. If you contribute $2,200, you'll get that exact sum from your employer as well.
Other employers calculate 401(k) matches as a percentage of salary. So your company, for example, might say that it'll match 100% of your contributions of up to 5% of your salary. So if you make $60,000 a year, you're eligible for up to $3,000. If you make $90,000 a year, you're eligible for up to $4,500.
In 2023, 81% of workers with 401(k)s at Fidelity received some type of employer matching contribution. And the average amount might surprise you — in a good way.
Employers weren't stingy
In 2023, the average 401(k) match was $4,600. That's not a negligible sum, and it's also really valuable given that employer matching dollars can be invested for added growth. If your 401(k) typically delivers a yearly return of 8%, which is a notch below the stock market's average, a $4,600 match on your employer's part this year could be worth $46,000 in 30 years. In 40 years, it could be worth almost $100,000.
As such, it's important to try to claim your full employer match if that option exists in your 401(k). That way, you won't miss out on free money — money you can then invest.
Should you save in your 401(k) plan beyond your employer match?
While it definitely pays to snag your full employer 401(k) match, whether it makes sense to fund your workplace plan beyond that point is questionable. Employer-sponsored 401(k) plans are notorious for charging high administrative fees. And because your investment choices tend to be more limited with a 401(k), you might lose money to investment-specific fees as well.
For example, you'll often find mutual funds and target funds in a 401(k). But the fees you're charged to put money into them, known as expense ratios, ca be significant.
Plus, with a 401(k), you don't get as much control over your investment portfolio as you do with an IRA. If you're someone who's willing to spend the time researching different stocks, then you may find that an IRA is a better bet for you. That's because IRAs allow you to buy stocks individually, whereas 401(k)s tend to limit you to funds whose specific holdings you're not selecting yourself.
All told, it's always smart to do what you can to take home your full 401(k) match. But it also doesn't hurt to spread your savings across multiple retirement plans so you get more investment options and can potentially lower your fees.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (487)
Related
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Video shows alligator's 'death roll' amid struggle with officers on North Carolina highway
- The Skinny Confidential Just Launched A Mini Version Of Its Cult-Fave Ice Roller, & We're Obsessed
- US Open champ Coco Gauff calls on young Americans to get out and vote. ‘Use the power that we have’
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Dolly Parton pays tribute to late '9 to 5' co-star Dabney Coleman: 'I will miss him greatly'
- Attorneys stop representing a Utah mom and children’s grief author accused of killing her husband
- More companies offer on-site child care. Parents love the convenience, but is it a long-term fix?
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Republicans Ted Cruz and Katie Britt introduce bill to protect IVF access
Ranking
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Perfect Match Trailer Reveals This Love Is Blind Villain Is Joining the Cast
- Indiana Fever's Caitlin Clark injures ankle, but returns in loss to Connecticut Sun
- Defense witness who angered judge in Trump’s hush money trial will return to the stand
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Significant Environmental and Climate Impacts Are Impinging on Human Rights in Every Country, a New Report Finds
- Parole delayed for former LA police detective convicted of killing her ex-boyfriend’s wife in 1986
- Save 50% on Thousands of Target Items, 70% on Kate Spade, 70% on Gap, 60% on J.Crew & Memorial Day Deals
Recommendation
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
49-year-old California man collapses, dies while hiking on Mount Shasta, police say
“Gutted” Victoria Monét Cancels Upcoming Shows Due to Health Issues
Climber's body found on Mount Denali in Alaska, North America's tallest
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Michigan county refused to certify vote, prompting fears of a growing election threat this fall
Gov. Moore celebrates ship’s removal, but says he won’t be satisfied until Key Bridge stands again
New York’s high court upholds requiring insurance to cover medically necessary abortions