Current:Home > ContactExxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books -GlobalInvest
Exxon Relents, Wipes Oil Sands Reserves From Its Books
View
Date:2025-04-17 02:17:20
ExxonMobil announced Wednesday that it had wiped off its books all 3.5 billion barrels of tar sands oil reserves at one of its projects in Canada. Because of recent low oil prices, the company said none of those reserves can be considered economical according to the accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accounting change at its Kearl project, a momentous if expected development, represented a turnaround for the company, which has long resisted calls to revise its reserves estimates. Over the past decade, Exxon had steadily increased its holdings in Canada’s tar sands to become a leading producer there.
Exxon also removed from its books 800 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in North America, though the reductions were offset by the addition of 1 billion barrels of oil and gas elsewhere.
Exxon said in October that low prices would likely force it to “de-book” up to 4.6 billion barrels of reserves in its end-of-year accounting. Securities and Exchange Commission rules allow oil companies to count reserves only if they are profitable based on average prices over the previous year.
But while the accounting change removes billions of dollars worth of tar sands investments from the company’s annual report, and is watched closely by investors, it will not directly affect operations. Exxon plans to continue operating its Kearl project, and said it will add back the reserves if oil prices rise or costs drop. After the reduction, the company now reports holding 1.3 billion barrels of tar sands reserves.
Exxon will hold an analyst meeting on March 1.
Earlier this week, ConocoPhillips said it had reduced its oil sands reserves by more than 1 billion barrels, bringing its total to 1.2 billion for 2016. These moves had been expected, as low oil prices have placed a heavy burden on tar sands projects, which are among the most expensive and polluting sources of oil.
veryGood! (23565)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
Ranking
- Small twin
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean